What kicked this off again was that YT recommended some vlogcasts. I looked at one as long as I could and there was a moment after which I just switched out.

There was this other one below which was far more measured but ultra-slow, goes on forever, so you’d need to be vitally interested and also have time to burn:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Williamson_(TV_personality)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Perry

Both missed the grounding I for one had … it was not a religious household, was pretty stock standard for values more 40s than 60s … people grew up, it was expected that a church wedding would eventuate … the question at the time was the honour and “obey” vow, so things were certainly in flux. We knew there were gays, paedos, weird people but on the whole, the middle followed the mores, though we did naughty things.

Chris W above (1988) and Louise P (1992) missed that grounding of the earlier times and have no concept of a trinity which can completely reshape and transform. So called Christians certainly divorce but real ones just have something about them I can’t define. I’ve known people not religious at all who were also in easygoing marriages … so it seems to me to be the parenting, what’s taught in school, the twisted culture, the cellphone, the porn … it’s near impossible without that old grounding I’d say, unless you’re a minority “nice couple” now.

Plus active measures for a few decades now by Them to pervert and wreck western underpinnings.

The other video which I clicked out of I can’t find now but essentially, it had about a dozen, maybe fifteen, sitting in a roundtable discussion about why men are not approaching women … meaning the young … late Millennials and younger … there was black and white there too.

One male said well why would we when y’all sleep around like hoes, completely unrealistic expectations, demands, demand the top 10% etc. etc. Why would we marry one of you, only for you to pick a fight, divorce, take half the property or more, move on?

The girl he was addressing shrugged and said: “So? You wanted to marry her … no reward without risk …” or similar. The room of course erupted, he said: “There it is out of your own mouth … there’s the reason we won’t go near you, except for a quick *&£#£&*. Who’d marry that?”

That’s where I departed. All right, how serious is the falling birthrate to stable, married couples? I’d say it’s dangerously serious … then add to that the testosterone drop, women thinking the IVF route is fine.

However, the influx of invaders makes it most critical … the swamping. And what do young, indigenous females do? Go interracial … which hardly protects the culture, does it? I’m the first to admit that going Serbian, Ukrainian, Russian, Hungarian, French, Italian, Spanish hardly helped Anglo culture, did it? I first went to Russia with an Indian girl.

 

(0658) morning all … still dark out there.

 

9. Trust in the media

8. TDS

I did look at TCW, nothing really stood out today.

7. The steal

How far is Starmer affected by the US result? Depends, imho, on the result. If Trump becomes the official 47, yugely … if the steal succeeds, then the World Govt moves closer with puppet Harris.

This news below seems innocuous on the surface:

A Georgia judge has ruled that election officials in the state must certify vote counts by the deadline set in law, even if errors or certification fraud is suspected. On Monday, Fulton County Superior Judge Robert McBurney ruled that “no election superintendent (or member of a board of elections and registration) may refuse to certify or abstain from certifying election results under any circumstance.”

There are all sorts of questions … how can one judge change an entire election result in a state? Then what of this lawfare language in the statement?

McBurney wrote in his ruling that the Georgia law refrains from including verbiage related to how county election officials have the authority to determine that fraud has occurred or what should be done about it.

With early voting, late ballots in the night and in the following days … this one tries to impose a catch-all date, precluding any investigation of allegations as “verbiage”? The entire conservative media has jumped on this.

I believe it will be stolen in the same way again, after which, all is melting pot. Those brave enough to protest will again be arrested, those doing the “crocodile eat me last, I have a wife and family” will slip back into their silence, everyone will retreat to their positions … nothing will be done, no revolution, just a lot of noise, as in Brazil.

Hoping I’ll be quite wrong and shall have to put out an egg on the face apology here. Another take on it I just saw:

6. Some US news

a.

(0330) Blog (0400) Sleep (0630) Blog (0651)

 

5. Falklands news

4. DAD at 844 across the way

a) In Ouistreham, [a ferry port near Caen] a 37-year-old self-employed man of foreign origin is extremely upset about being evicted from his favorite bar, ‘The Havane’…

b) Senior EU officials are considering heavily restricting citizens’ ability to smoke on balconies and in private cars.

c) Taliban run-media have stopped showing images of living beings in some Afghan provinces to comply with morality laws, an official confirmed Tuesday.

d) Please join us in asking Nike to do the right thing & stand up for girls, by sharing our new ad, “Dear Nike”.

3. This downunder illustrates the western malaise

This will take some explaining. Wiki, despite its left bias, still uses the word “claims”: “Thomas Mayo is an Australian human rights advocate and author who claims Indigenous Australian ancestry.” Think you get the idea. And with the next item was a photo of him standing beside Oz Labor PM, apparently as bad as Starmer … Labor/Demonrat interchangeable, you get the idea again.

There was a referendum … govts only give them if the result seems a shoe-in … and this was to give aborigines a “Voice” in parliament … weird concept as the 1969 referendum gave them full voting rights as adults, as with other Australians. Of course, the whole reparations scam went on, charging money for “tribal sites of interest” etc.

However, many radical aborigines went the other way, campaigning against a Yes in the referendum, as it was a scam to empower people like Mayo who have Elizabeth Warren levels of “indigenosity”. The Oz voters resoundingly voted No to the scam. Now:

This person Mayo is exactly like those over here making out the UK can still rejoin the EU … to get around it, they join or stay with other corrupt bodies, e.g. the ECHR …

2. Is Cheney’s corruption direct criminality?

1. Steve selection overnight at 843

MftWC 4: Hurricane Milton Exposes Green New Deal’s Fragility: Costly Solar Panels Destroyed in Florida, Leaving Thousands in the Dark

MftWC 3: Leo Hohmann: Pentagon Issues Federal Directive Allowing Military to use ‘Lethal Force’ Against Americans as Video Resurfaces Showing Kamala Fantasizing About Weaponizing DOJ Against US Citizens

MftWC 2: Poland Expecting Kiev Regime’s Total Defeat, Planning For War With Russia

MftWC 1: Deaths in Western Australia town (Port Hedland) increase sevenfold after Covid vaccine rollout